Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Matt Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> Having to waste time with nearly every patch, adjusting to >>>> globally-inconsistent indentation like this is why I'll probably end up >>>> making things consistent, once (if ever) there are few enough outstanding >>>> patches. >>> >>> I guess we ought to revisit the proposal to indent whole code using a >>> tool. I fully agree that this is boring and stupid. >>> >>> unclutter looks like a nice tool for that. >> >> What about 'indent' >> I recall hearing about some beautification about a year ago regarding >> the use of indent? > > What I think unclutter is better is that it does support C++ and could
I think you mean uncrustify. unclutter is an X program. Let's defer this to when the patch queue is small enough that a mass-reformatting change won't cause trouble. Don't worry. I'm very motivated to address the problem. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
