Joel Granados wrote:
> Just read this going throuhg 3 months of backed up parted mail. You
> make a very good point but I think going agains the spec is not the way
> to go. This would increase the possibility of incompatibilities with
> other UEFI spec implementations other than what parted has (which I'm
> not al all sure it complies 100% :)
>
> For me, this is a big question mark ATM.
It's not going against spec. The UEFI spec doesn't specify what goes in
that area, and it is *guaranteed* to break GPT booting on BIOS
platforms, which is about as disastrous as you can get.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
