Hi Gilles: Sorry for the misunderstanding. When I did not get a reply from you I assumed you where just offering to review the patch and not to post one. Posting one is much better!!! :)
But, I think we can take advantage of the current situation. Since I have posted the patch for problem 6, this should be a good example of the things I was talking to you about in an earlier mail (the patch and the test). The test for 6. needs a litte work, but the main concept of it all is contained in my ninth patch [9/9] that I sent yesterday. My comments bellow On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:36:23AM +0200, Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joel Granados" <[email protected]> > To: "Gilles Espinasse" <[email protected]>; "Parted Devel" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:43 PM > Subject: Re: [parted-devel] Parted Stuff that needs fixing before 1.8.9 > > > ... > > Seems like I misunderstood your email. I thought you wanted to post a > > patch. I will continue to address 6. and 7. while using the info you > > posted. > > > Sorry > I just learn yesterday how to send my first patch directly from git, a bit > later after you had send the patches. No worries. > > What I just don't know now is on wich branche the patches has been commited. > In http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git The branch for these patches is the master branch. We are trying to get all the issues that are backlogged in the mailing list committed so we can release parted-1.9.0. > I see 3 branches (master, next, stable-1.8.x) where since 8 days only > master has been updated. > I would test if parted configured with --without-fs work better on git tree > than 1.8.8. Can you expand on the troubles you had with configuring parted --with-fs. It works ok for me. If you are having some troubles regarding the test it might be because you don't have some FileSystem package installed. > When configured with --without-fs, > parted $dev mkpart primary ext2 was aborting with unknow fs type. > Not a big problem with ext2 as I think this is the default partition type, > so ext2 could be omitted. > But that was unusable with other partition type (like hfs). > > Gilles > -- Joel Andres Granados Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
