On 3/29/2010 12:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Thanks! > This looks like a fine patch. > However, I would like a minimal test that fails without it, > yet that succeeds with the patch. > > Can you provide one?
I also ran into this over the weekend. IIRC you just have to run parted with -a none and put it in sector unit mode, then when you create a logical partition with a starting sector +1 from the starting sector of the extended partition, it fails. It seems at some point along the line that the kernel was patched to create a device node for the extended partition ( I swear there was a time when it didn't ) and always sets the size to 2 sectors so that you can install LILO to the extended partition. I've posted a message to LKML today about this because I think this is an error; the size should be as much or as little hidden sectors there are before the start of the logical partition. In this test case where the logical starts on the very next sector, then the extended partition should only have a length of 1. Since it gets a length of 2 instead, parted fails to add the logical partition since it overlaps with the extended. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
