Phillip Susi wrote: > On 3/29/2010 1:37 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I tried to do what I think you and Colin have suggested, >> but parted succeeds (and prints identical output) both with >> and without the patch. >> >> Note how the logical partition starts one sector >> after the beginning of the extended one. >> >> Did I misunderstand? >> >> #!/bin/sh >> PATH=../parted:$PATH >> sector_size_=512 >> ss=$sector_size_ >> dev=dev-file >> rm -f $dev >> n_sectors=10000 > > You are using a file not a real disk device, so the kernel does not get > informed of the partition table.
Yes, that would do it. Thanks. Another test that will require the pesky scsi_debug module. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
