Phillip Susi wrote: > On 4/30/2010 10:55 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> It sounds worthy, but won't make it to the front of my queue any >> time soon. Before doing that, I want to make a bug-fix release, >> and then remove all FS-related code.
[Just so no one misunderstands, HFS/HFS+ and FAT resizing code will have to be retained for the forseeable future, but everything else will go. ] > Sounds good. By the way, does this mean that mkpartfs will go away? Yes. > What about the fs parameter to mkpart that is used to decide on the > partition type? "mkpart" will continue to accept its FS_TYPE argument. mkpart performs no FS-specific operation, so I see no down side. The alternative would be needlessly disruptive. I wrote the above, then read the end of your sentence: "decide on the partition type" but I couldn't make sense of that, since the partition type (when allowed) must be specified. There's nothing to decide about it. > Will that be changed to just specify the partition type > directly? _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
