On 06/07/2011 08:53 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Yes, just like the original code. > The reason I prefer not to ignore the return value is to avoid > warnings from static analyzers.
Declare it (void) explicitly then...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
