H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/07/2011 09:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> However, I don't want to ignore the return value. >> >> How about the patch below? >> I left your name on it. >> Let me know if that's ok. > > assert (n >= 2); > > ... would be more succinct to me and more future-proof, but that's just > stylistic...
Thanks but I pushed it as-is. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
