Phillip Susi wrote: > The following commit broke the position of the LastUsableLBA:
Hi Phillip, Thanks for the patch, but I don't understand the above explanation. What motivated you to make this change? > 48f236f9: gpt: permit "mklabel gpt" on a 67-sector device > > This effectively reverts that commit, as well as adjusting the subsequent > commits to instead use 68 sectors as the minimum length, since there > appears to be other parted code that can not cope with a partition table > without room for at least a 1 sector partition, Please provide details of the above. > and creating a partition > table without room for any partitions is silly anyhow. IMHO, there is value in testing the limits of the code. Unless the specification prohibits it -- or maybe if it's too hard to do right -- I would like to support it.
