-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/30/2012 02:50 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > IMHO, there is value in testing the limits of the code. Unless the > specification prohibits it -- or maybe if it's too hard to do right > -- I would like to support it.
The more I think about it the more it seems that a 67 sector device size *is* illegal. FirstUsableLBA and LastUsableLBA can hold the same value, but they must point to a usable LBA. With this size there are no usable LBAs, thus no valid value for these variables. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ4bBHAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75PnsH/3DglUk0Eeyx37pN3RWD7rxk QUEL1+SNCqps9E/9bbo03jET1h3PGULV0jsSVIJovqcTfO59lAt2H6uVZDN3oh0A HHZAaKpWvpjoSUpZ57d+HlKRPvzYyg0pRHzdK24INEwkK30EGehER4Xw+q8jPbNh pk4zkIZvakK6+Ycp6hAgsh1FGd3XrdjhHcabl8L7KlQDkhH5IW+/SfxbHpLskuqH UEiFTU2zC4cf6fVP22D6rMYDKj4IgG5x2p9iA3miSRDvCcKVqWwwBkKXF6d9M+K3 z4dn0Oq6mRzQi67lnllL1eAR2eUpbEhqZs/5cm+2qxuC+pnPMoRBYxiNhloOBlU= =pRjk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
