On 05/17/2014 02:17 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 05/16/2014 07:45 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: >> There was a problem using UTF-16, it was writing the Byte Order >> Mark before the string which caused problems with older versions of >> parted reading the partition name. The test was skipping these 2 >> bytes when checking the written string. > > Good catch, I didn't realize UTF-16 inserted the BOM when writing. > Two thumbs up.
Just saw this. Shouldn't this be UTF-16LE?
-hpa
