On 03/20/2015 05:57 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 03/05/2015 07:45 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> Good catch, I didn't realize UTF-16 inserted the BOM when >>> writing. Two thumbs up. > >> Just saw this. Shouldn't this be UTF-16LE? > > I'm not really sure what the difference is. What does the UEFI spec say > ? >
It isn't about the UEFI spec but rather what iconv expects. The string
"UTF-16LE" produces littleendian UTF-16 without BOM.
-hpa
