Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Antoine Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I thought that the TCP code that defaults to "127.0.0.1" was a good >> idea, but in fact it gets in the way of allowing it to bind to all >> interfaces (which is also done by using "" as the IP). >> Other options would have added command line switches and complications, >> this is the easiest option. It may require updating the man page to make >> it clear (although it does say tcp mode is insecure) > > What happens if you use "0.0.0.0" as the host now? Does it give what you want? > > If so, then I'd rather document that and leave the default > (relatively) secure... Hah, I wasn't aware of this option, doesn't seem to be documented where I looked. Works for me! (you can drop the patch)
Thanks Antoine _______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
