On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Antoine Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Let me see if I get this right, you're trying to use Win32 named pipes > as a replacement for unix domain sockets on the client? > That still would not resolve the issue of transport: putty does not > handle named pipes and OpenSSH would require cygwin libraries. > Or am I missing something?
No, I'm trying to use Win32 sockets as a replacement for unix pipes on the client. Which, if I am understanding this (very confusing and poorly documented) API right, will allow us to use putty (or rather plink) on Win32 as a transport in exactly the same way we use ssh on unix. Does that clarify things? Does the code work for you? -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
