On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 05:11PM -0400, Mark Gardner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 19:49:56 +0200, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
> > *simple* bash scripts I've found are either trivial or
> > {fragile,wrong,buggy,insecure}. Again, I'd support C (or anything widely
> > supported) for pass 2.0
>
> Lately I have switched all my C hacking over to Golang (Go). While pass
> would need to be compiled individually for each platform, it would keep
> portability, including Windows. We should seriously consider re-writing
> pass in Go.It is very difficult to write correct programs in C, and very easy to write C programs with security holes in it. Since the topic here is security, I would advise against C. Go, Rust, Java even, or scripting languages such as Python, Ruby or even Perl are probaly safer than C (or C++). Matthieu -- (~._.~) Matthieu Weber - [email protected] (~._.~) ( ? ) http://weber.fi.eu.org/ ( ? ) ()- -() public key id : 0x85CB340EFCD5E0B3 ()- -() (_)-(_) "Humor ist, wenn man trotzdem lacht (Otto J. Bierbaum)" (_)-(_)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
