I'll chime in as one more voice in favor of keeping pass as a shell script. It's a big part of what drew me to pass in the first place. There are a lot of other password managers, but there aren't any that are nearly as transparent as pass.
Best, Daniel On 06/15, Héctor Rivas Gándara wrote: > > what initially drew people to pass over other (perhaps more conventional > database-backed) solutions > > In my case, this: > > $ gpg -d < ~/.password-store/test/hello.gpg > > ;) > > -- > Héctor Rivas > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Ben Oliver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 18-06-15 09:16:27, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > > >> I see the point of replacing bash with another programming language, that > >> being said, I feel the urge to say something about this without falling > >> into the trap of ranting about programming languages. One of the key > >> points > >> of pass that was really the selling point for me was, apart from perfectly > >> solving the problem it was designed to solve, the transparency of the > >> implementation. > >> > > > > This is it for me too. The design is so simple that the drawbacks, like > > having the file names exposed, are immediately obvious to any newcomer. > > There are no nasty suprises down the line - it's just gpg and git. > > > > I'm not saying that moving away from bash is a bad idea, just that it is > > important to think about what initially drew people to pass over other > > (perhaps more conventional database-backed) solutions. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Password-Store mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Password-Store mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store _______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
