>> You lost me. I will rejoin when you are on github. Please reconsider the >> user experience of your community. I guess some of them got used to it, >> but i doubed that they are happy. > > You really lost me on this too. In foss open sources project we do not > depends on any forge platforms.
I think Christian finds the absence of a bug tracker an issue to have a global view of the work being done on pass. While many foss projects don’t rely on proprietary platforms, some do have a bug tracker like Python (https://bugs.python.org), GDB (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/). PostgreSQL for example, do all development and review in a mailing list like you do, but has https://commitfest.postgresql.org/28/ that tells you exactly on what people are currently working and what is the status of the patches. While I absolutely appreciate pass a lot, and find this mailing list very active and helpful, can you tell what two patches I sent that fixed issues that *completely* broke pass on my systems? A bug tracker (which can be used in foss, even when using cgit) would give the answer immediately and I wouldn’t be afraid that those patches will be forgotten and stay forever in the mailing list archive without being ever committed. Cheers, Rémi
