On 12/17/2009 10:59 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi Eric,
Here we go.
Is that the correct one?
I added this one (and a few others) to:
http://gnuradio.org/cgit/balister.git/log/?h=patches-from-list
Philip
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 17:34, Eric Blossom<e...@comsec.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:09:02AM +0300, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone to apply this one-liner?
Alexander,
The hard-coded magic numbers below the assert need to be corrected to
to be a function of the clock rate. You're not seeing the problem
because of the daughterboard you're using, but if you're using a Basic
Tx, they come into play.
The existing magic numbers are particular percentages of 128e6.
The replacements, f(clock_rate), should be the same percentages.
They control when and which "coarse modulator" is used in the AD9862.
Can you please submit a slightly bigger patch?
I apologize for not writing earlier about what the problem was.
Thanks,
Eric
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 01:01, Alexander Chemeris
<alexander.cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
This assert is not valid, because you may use re-clocked USRP.
And we indeed do ;)
Patch to remove it is in attachment.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
_______________________________________________
Patch-gnuradio mailing list
Patch-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/patch-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Patch-gnuradio mailing list
Patch-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/patch-gnuradio
