also sprach Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> [2010.02.10.1712 +1300]: > I am pretty sure patchwork was designed to consider a patch sent > (even in reply to another patch) as an independent thing ...
That would explain the behaviour I am seeing. I wonder if there's an automated way to let updated patches mark the preceding one as superseded? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ due to lack of interest tomorrow has been cancelled. spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
