also sprach Jeremy Kerr <j...@ozlabs.org> [2010.02.11.1659 +1300]: > The last point is the hard bit, so I'd like any ideas you have on > exposing these relations. I was thinking of adding a "related > patches" list to the patch page (or a link to the set of related > patches on a separate page), grouped by relation type. This will > let the maintainer quickly grab all patches in one series (without > needing to create a bundle), or see that a patch has an update.
Yes, that sounds nice. It would still be helpful if related patches would show up as such in the patch list too. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ be careful of reading health books -- you might die of a misprint. -- mark twain spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
