On 28 Aug 21:10, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> writes: > > > > with open(args[0], 'rb') as file_: > > decoded_mail = file_.read().decode('utf-8') > > mail = email.message_from_string(decoded_mail) > > > > This is super ugly, but works in Py3. Ironically it doesn't work in Py2, > > but it's a start. Could you include something like this in this patch > > set? I think the parsearchive will require something similar too. > > Looks like there's message_from_bytes and message_from_binary_file in > recent versions of 'email' - I haven't tried but I assume that would be > better. Anyway, I'll leave it to your judgement. > > Regards, > Daniel
This is a definite issue, but I think it's outside of the scope of this series. Could you open a bug on the issue tracker [1] and we'll resolve it in a follow-up? Stephen [1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues > > > > I'm going to start collecting these "interesting" emails to make a test > > suite. > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > > [0] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2016-August/003158.html _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
