Stephen Finucane <[email protected]> writes: > On 28 Aug 21:10, Daniel Axtens wrote: >> Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >> > with open(args[0], 'rb') as file_: >> > decoded_mail = file_.read().decode('utf-8') >> > mail = email.message_from_string(decoded_mail) >> > >> > This is super ugly, but works in Py3. Ironically it doesn't work in Py2, >> > but it's a start. Could you include something like this in this patch >> > set? I think the parsearchive will require something similar too. >> >> Looks like there's message_from_bytes and message_from_binary_file in >> recent versions of 'email' - I haven't tried but I assume that would be >> better. Anyway, I'll leave it to your judgement. >> >> Regards, >> Daniel > > This is a definite issue, but I think it's outside of the scope of this > series. Could you open a bug on the issue tracker [1] and we'll resolve > it in a follow-up?
Fair enough. Will do. Regards, Daniel > > Stephen > > [1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues > >> > >> > I'm going to start collecting these "interesting" emails to make a test >> > suite. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Daniel >> > >> > [0] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2016-August/003158.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
