On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 00:57 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> We remove fields that shouldn't be seen on old versions of the API.
> This was done with `pop(field name)`, which will throw an exception
> if the named field is absent from the data. However, sometimes if
> a patch request is via an old API version, we hit this line without
> ever having the field present.
>
> This is odd, but not harmful and we definitely shouldn't 500.
>
> Fixes: d944f17ec059 ("REST: Use versioning for modified responses")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <step...@that.guru>
I squashed the test into this (with a tweak in the name) and applied it.
Thanks!
Stephen
_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
