Wow - I did not know you could even do this!  Thanks for the tip!

Dan

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:26 AM, iamnowonmai<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just to let you know - I just shipped a defective drive to seagate and faxed
> them a signed "Certification of Destruction for Secure Sites" form that they
> provided me. I kept the platters and sent them back the top cover of the
> drive, for RMA purposes. If the data is important to you, I would recommend
> pursuing that avenue.
> HTH
> iamnowonmai
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Joel Folkerts <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I strongly agree with Tim. While I trust that Seagate is handling the
>> drives appropriately, you aren't guaranteed that they won't doll this task
>> out to a sub who isn't as thorough. It's also not clear what they mean by a
>> "low-level" format. Keep in mind that the drive tracks which sectors are
>> usable and not - if a drive detects that a sector is unreliable, it will
>> mark it as bad (leaving the existing data intact) and never read or write
>> from it again. When a drive is subsequently wiped, it will skip past these
>> sectors leaving the existing data in place. Ideally, they would erase the
>> bad sector list and wipe every physical sector on the disk. Again, I
>> reasonably suspect that Seagate handles this properly but a degauser is
>> relatively cheap insurance.
>>
>> -Joel
>>
>> p.s. As a quick after thought, this is a very secure way of hiding data.
>> 1.) Erase bad sector listing; 2.) Wipe drive; 3.) Write data; 4.) Manually
>> mark those sectors as bad; 5.) Data is now hidden. As far as I know, this
>> process requires a some fairly expensive and specialized hardware but it is
>> capable.
>>
>>
>> "The path to hell is paved with good intentions."
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Tim Mugherini<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > We recently went through a similar line of questioning with our
>> > vendors/manufacturers and received a mix of responses. In the end we
>> > purchased a degauser. None of them seemed to care if drives were
>> > degaused before sending back.
>> >
>> > On 7/7/09, Dan Stadelman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I think I was talking to tkrabec in IRC about how hard drive vendors
>> >> handle the data on defective hard drives that were returned under
>> >> warranty. So I sent a question off to Seagate to see what they do with
>> >> the data on defective drives...
>> >>
>> >> Obviously if there is something sensitive on the drive, then you
>> >> should destroy it - but their response was pretty interesting...
>> >>
>> >> Dan
>> >>
>> >> QUESTION:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I was wondering what happens to the defective drives that are returned
>> >> to Seagate. I know you sell refurbished drives - is the data on the
>> >> returned drives wiped before you sell them a refurbished drives? If
>> >> so, how are the drives wiped.
>> >>
>> >> I am worried about someone being able to recover data off a returned
>> >> drive.
>> >>
>> >> RESPONSE:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for sending your Seagate E-mail inquiry.
>> >>
>> >> Seagate takes measures to ensure the security of all of our customer's
>> >> personal, confidential data. When a drive arrives at our returns depot
>> >> facility, it will first be tested. During the first phase of testing
>> >> it is low-level formatted which completely wipes it of any and all
>> >> data from sector 0 to the last sector. As a returning defective drive,
>> >> if the drive is not in a functional state capable of a low-level
>> >> format, the drive is disassembled and the platters (where the data is
>> >> stored) are recycled. Once a platter is removed from the spindle of a
>> >> hard drive, the data is no longer readable by any means.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Hassan Zouga
>> >> Warranty and Customer Support Escalation
>> >> Seagate Technology, Inc
>> >> 1 800 SEAGATE
>> >> ref:00D0hhzl.50036lvP0:ref
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from my mobile device
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pauldotcom mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to