Jim, at one point that was the attitude of law enforcement.  I know, I
was there... it was fugly.

But unfortunately, the volume of these sorts of issues is such that
*every* police department i've worked with in the past 5 years has a
computer forensics "go-to guy" either internal or external.  As a
result, assuming you approach them correctly, you're not going to get
any flack.  I know... I'm there now.

<warning -- I'm getting on my high horse>

I'm *very* concerned with your approach, mostly from a moral
standpoint.  If my turning over files is helpful in breaking a case,
or just building a case, it is WELL worth the minor inconvenience of
handing files over.  Just deleting files and walking away is not
something I would ever encourage.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing." (Edmund Burke)

<off high horse>


Again, please get a lawyer!  You have to know what protections you
have in your jurisdiction.
- Mick



On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jim Halfpenny <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/9/10 Michael Dickey <[email protected]>
>>
>> Personally, I think I would wipe it clean off. That's not something I'd
>> like to ever mess with or run afoul of.
>>
>> But there may be value in forensically examining the files or the victims,
>> so it might be best to report the incident and turn over evidence.
>
> I for one would not expect a friendly or sympathetic response from law
> enforcement if I approached them with such evidence. My gut instinct is to
> securely delete and ignore, grave though the crime may be. If you are not a
> law enforcement officer it's not your business to investigate crimes and
> doing so could land you in hot water. IANAL but I don't think you are duty
> bound to report a crime if the only report you can give is, "Paedophiles are
> using anonymising tools on the Internet."
>
> Consult legal council. You may wish to document incidents where you are
> inadvertantly exposed to such material and keep a copy of this log with a
> solictor should you ever get into trouble.
>
> Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to