I was just reading the story on the Wal-Mart attack in Wired : http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/walmart-hack/
In the story they claim "no sensitive customer data was stolen". How can they be so sure? The story tells that the attacker got Admin privs, so access to all user accounts and passwords. IMHO they can encrypt all they want. It's game over. How can they make a claim that no sensitive data was stolen? Bert _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
