Hopefully they log data access success and failures and send those logs to a centralized server. That's how I would make that claim. But I might say "all evidence indicates..." anyway.
-- Dan McGinn-CombsBert Van Kets wrote: I was just reading the story on the Wal-Mart attack in Wired : http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/walmart-hack/ In the story they claim "no sensitive customer data was stolen". How can they be so sure? The story tells that the attacker got Admin privs, so access to all user accounts and passwords. IMHO they can encrypt all they want. It's game over. How can they make a claim that no sensitive data was stolen? Bert _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
