I was going to pass on this because my comments are somewhat off-topic,
but...

I have respect for the people who earn the cert, but it disgusts me.
"Certified Ethical Hacker" implies something I do not believe, and which I
find offensive.  Ptacek summed it up pretty well a few years ago:

""ethical hacker" is an offensive term, implying the obvious about those who
don't have the cert."

There may be some value to the training and cert, and I encourage people to
do the right thing for their careers.

<dismounts his high-horse>

Jack



On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Butturini, Russell <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I second Herndon’s sentiments.  I am biased because I sit on the EC Council
> continuing education board, but even before I joined that I was impressed
> with the content and depth of the CEH certification.  It really requires a
> broad knowledgebase to be successful on the exam.
>
>
>
> You have to start somewhere, and either of these two would be good starting
> points.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Herndon Elliott
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:36 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Pauldotcom] Opinions on certs security/network
>
>
>
> > Ive looked at CEH and security+ and just laughed.
>
>
>
> If you are laughing at CEH, then I think you have become a bit jaded!  The
> CEH cert is not easy, and is fairly well-respected in my experience.  There
> are no certs that will be universal.....there is always some staleness in
> every certification due to the nature of the necessary standardized testing,
> leadtime for development etc.  But the CEH, IMHO, is one of the better ones
> if you are after a technical cert.  Otherwise, just commit some high-profile
> break-in, serve your time, then use that street cred as your certification.
> Good luck with that.
>
> Herndon Elliott, CISSP
> Madison, Al
> "Washington is broken and we need clear leaders and patriots, not polished
> political hacks."  -- Ginni Thomas
>
> ******************************************************************************
> This email contains confidential and proprietary information and is not to be 
> used or disclosed to anyone other than the named recipient of this email,
> and is to be used only for the intended purpose of this communication.
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>



-- 
______________________________________
Jack Daniel, Reluctant CISSP
http://twitter.com/jack_daniel
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackadaniel
http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to