Zate: good point.
I don't think this is flame bait but a valid point to consider when we start to think that maybe our TLAs are sneakier than we originally imagined. On Dec 15, 2010 11:09 AM, "Mike Patterson" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010/12/15 12:20 PM, Dan McGinn-Combs wrote: >> Sorry - didn't really intend this to be flame-bait (or any other kind). > > Oh, I know. And I didn't intend to flame you. :) > >> I do have to hang my head in shame... I used OpenBSD for several years >> because the system inter-operated so well with Check Point's VPN >> feature. I only once looked over the source code, and it was a cursory >> review at that. I wonder if Check Point lifted the code intact. >> Perhaps I should have grep'ed for "FBI". Or perhaps "Mossad". > > Why on earth would you be ashamed of that? Have you read gmail's source > code? Who has the time to review all source code for all versions of > any software they've ever used? At a certain point you need to trust. > > I think the FBI has a bit more sense than to put their name right in > though. Try GCJ next time. :-) > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Pauldotcom mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
