I'm biased since I work for a managed security service provider, but I have
to say there is value there. If your a firewall guy, this could be bad. If
your goal is to be a comprehensive security guy and put the needs of the
business first...this makes sense. I can only deal with firewall BS for so
long. I do not want to be making firewall changes  while I can be doing
better things with my time such as policy issues, compliance, pen testing,
IDS/IPS, etc, etc, etc. Depending on your firewall vendor, this make make
even more sense. Checkpoint is ALOT of overhead = time not well spent in
management, but a market leader in FW. Other vendors equal less overhead, so
in house MAY make sense, but still.... do I want to retire as the firewall
guy. Been there, done that.

--Chris Serafin



On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Josh More <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it's a good idea if the other company can do a better job of it
> than you can.  You trust your ISP with your packets; this is the same thing,
> just a different place to draw the line.
>
> Is it ideal?  If course not.  However, you can't do it all, so it makes
> sense to focus where you can.  As always, if you extend your trust like
> that, it would be wise to monitor their actions to make sure they are worthy
> of your trust.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Matthew Perry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> We have been acquired by another company that is use to outsourcing
>> their management and monitoring of firewalls to another company.  I
>> have always been against this especially since they would have the
>> keys for any point to point connections.  How does everyone else in
>> the pauldotcom community feel about this and is it a standard
>> practice?
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Perry
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to