Hi all,
I also support the proposed change. Jc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gerald Chouinard Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 1:25 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [paws] Charter update progress All, I support Andy's proposed text. Gerald ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, 03 May, 2012 08:31 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [paws] Charter update progress Gabor may have a combined view of the proposals - I still support my initial proposal of April 15th, which was to change the new bullet point 5 from "Report to the white space database anticipated spectrum usage at a suitable granularity" to "Report spectrum usage to the white space database at a suitable granularity". Regards Andy From: Peter Stanforth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 03 May 2012 13:24 To: Sago,AJ,Andy,COD R; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [paws] Charter update progress What is the proposal? From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [paws] Charter update progress Gabor There has been no reflector discussion since 24th April UK time. Can we now submit the charter proposal to the IESG, or has that already happened? Thanks Andy
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
