This sounds like a good clarification to me.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Sungjin, All, > > Part of the confusion of how to interpret the available-spectrum response, > perhaps, > is in the naming of the "maxPowerDBm" variable. E.g., > > "spectra": [ > { > "bandwidth": 6e6, > "frequencyRanges": [ > {"startHz":5.18e8, "stopHz":5.36e8, "maxPowerDBm":30.0}, > ... > ] > }, > { > "bandwidth": 1e5, > "frequencyRanges": [ > {"startHz":5.18e8, "stopHz":5.36e8, "maxPowerDBm":27.0}, > ... > ] > } > > > Given that this power really represents "power spectral density" over the > specified > bandwidth (e.g., 6e6 or 1e5), should we rename it to something like the > following? > > maxPsdDbmPerBandwidth > > Where "bandwidth" refers to the bandwidth specified for that spectrum > profile. > > -- > -vince > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws > > -- ---------------------------------- Michael R Head <[email protected]> http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~mike +1-201-BLISTER
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
