Vince,
It looks better to understand.
Regards,
Sungjin
On 07/26/2013 02:11 PM, Michael Head wrote:
This sounds like a good clarification to me.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Vincent Chen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sungjin, All,
Part of the confusion of how to interpret the available-spectrum
response, perhaps,
is in the naming of the "maxPowerDBm" variable. E.g.,
"spectra": [
{
"bandwidth": 6e6,
"frequencyRanges": [
{"startHz":5.18e8, "stopHz":5.36e8, "maxPowerDBm":30.0},
...
]
},
{
"bandwidth": 1e5,
"frequencyRanges": [
{"startHz":5.18e8, "stopHz":5.36e8, "maxPowerDBm":27.0},
...
]
}
Given that this power really represents "power spectral density"
over the specified
bandwidth (e.g., 6e6 or 1e5), should we rename it to something
like the following?
maxPsdDbmPerBandwidth
Where "bandwidth" refers to the bandwidth specified for that
spectrum profile.
--
-vince
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
--
----------------------------------
Michael R Head <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~mike <http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/%7Emike>
+1-201-BLISTER
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
