On 26 Jul 2013, at 03:16, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > How about the following wording? > > Slave Device: A device that uses a Master Device to query a Spectrum Database > on its behalf to find available spectrum. The slave device may or may not > have geo-location capability. A slave device that does not have geo-location > capability MUST get available spectrum via a Master Device.
That's fine apart from the last sentence. In the ETSI / OFCOM model, a slave MUST _always_ get available spectrum via a Master Device whether the slave has geolocation capability or not. If it gets spectrum directly from the WSDB, by definition it's not a slave. Ray _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
