Hi,

 

Even I would understand Slave/Master as roles which devices can play. Slave
device as:  "A device which does not directly communicate with WSDB, and
uses services of Master to communicate with other WSDs." Geo-location and
other capabilities whether it can have or not is not really in scope of the
definition. Yes, the device should have whitespace radio capabilities, and a
way to communicate with Master for sure.

 

Regards,

Sajeev

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Vincent Chen
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:01 PM
To: Ray Bellis
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [paws] definition of Slave device

 

In that case, I believe the PAWS document should refer to Slave and Master
as roles, and I should not include the last sentence in the proposed text.

 

We probably also need to add:

 

  Whether a single device is allowed to serve both Slave and Master roles
depends on regulatory rules.

 

-vince

 

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ray Bellis <[email protected]>
wrote:


On 26 Jul 2013, at 15:25, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the ETSI / OFCOM model, is Slave a "role" or a static / certified
property of the device?

I would tend towards the latter.  The ETSI draft standard contains this
definition:

"slave WSD: WSD that is only able to communicate with other WSDs, when under
the control of a master WSD"

and this:

"master WSD: geo-located WSD that is able to communicate directly with a
TVWSDB and with WSDs"


> Consider  the use case:
>  -  A portable device has location capability, but is not yet on a network
>  - It acts like a Slave in this phase to contact a Master in order to get
spectrum
>  - It now can establish network connection to the Database directly using
the spectrum
>
> In the ETSI / OFCOM model:
>  1. Can it now ask the Database directly for spectrum? because it may be
able to operate at higher power?

I believe that this is *not* permitted.  A slave device that has geolocation
capability MAY ask for device specific RF parameters, but MUST do so through
its Master.

OFCOM's specification explicitly prohibits a (master) WSD from talking to
the WSDB over the managed UHF spectrum, it needs to use some other form of
link.

kind regards,

Ray







 

-- 
-vince 

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to