On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 15:41 +0000, Harasty, Daniel J wrote: > somehow “rescind” a channel previously stated as available -- provided > if there is a widely accepted use case based on regulatory guidelines.
Dan, The use case has already been stated. Consider an emergency that requires a public safety mobilization type of response -- earthquake or hurricane or somebody flying airliners into buildings ... any will do. Emergency services needs to mobilize and they need more spectrum (or access to spectrum ... contention-free MACs are time-share): - to accommodate a quickly accelerated operations tempo - to replace wired connectivity that has been interrupted by the disaster. _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
