Agreed. I was carefully avoiding the 'how'.
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 10:13 -0700, Vincent Chen wrote: > Rex, > > > This is a requirement of capability, but it does not require that it > be done through the use of SPECTRUM_NOTIFY. > It could be easily satisfied if the Device were to use > AVAIL_SPECTRUM_GET periodically to refresh its list, which could > result in 0 spectrum. > > > -vince > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rex Buddenberg > <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 15:41 +0000, Harasty, Daniel J wrote: > > somehow “rescind” a channel previously stated as available > -- provided > > if there is a widely accepted use case based on regulatory > guidelines. > > > > Dan, > > The use case has already been stated. Consider an emergency > that > requires a public safety mobilization type of response -- > earthquake or > hurricane or somebody flying airliners into buildings ... any > will do. > Emergency services needs to mobilize and they need more > spectrum (or > access to spectrum ... contention-free MACs are time-share): > - to accommodate a quickly accelerated operations tempo > - to replace wired connectivity that has been interrupted by > the > disaster. > > > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws > > > > > -- > -vince _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
