> I've uploaded a new draft of PAWS that I believe addresses all the points
> raised by the ADs, Gen-ART, and at the F2F.
Vince, thanks so much for the quick work on getting this done.
Essentially all my points have been addressed. I have this ready to
post as a non-blocking, minor comment whenever Pete creates a ballot
for the document:
----------------------------------------
A small point in the header:
"iconectiv (formerly Telcordia Interconnection Solutions)"
I think it's fine to put that in the "Authors' Addresses" section, but
the header should just say "iconectiv". I realize that takes a little
inconvenient massaging of the XML, and probably isn't worth the
trouble for the I-D. Might just put that in an RFC Editor note....
-- Section 2.2 --
As a very minor thing, I suggest this (adding URIs for the agencies,
and specifying "U.S." for FCC):
OLD
ETSI: European Telecommunications Standards Institute
FCC: Federal Communications Commission
NEW
ETSI: European Telecommunications Standards Institute
<http://etsi.org>
FCC: The U.S. Federal Communications Commission
<http://fcc.gov>
END
-- Section 6 --
As I had concerns in version -12 with the use of JSON schema language
that hasn't been fully specified and is in an expired I-D, I should
explicitly say that I'm happy with what Section 6 and its subsections
look like in version -13. Thanks for the fix!
----------------------------------------
Barry
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
