Some attended the Butterworth Congress, while some decided to stay away from it. Not all those who attended the congress are in favour of what is happening in PAC, but were trying everything to take PAC away from Letlapa and his group with the aim of taking it back to the people who are in branches. Let's go to those who chose to stay away from the Butterworth procedings. This group is divided in two. One group is saying PAC need a platform that will give a way foward, but my question is, how will that happen without being seen as another group within PAC, while that is claiming to be genuine? Let us remember we need the power of PAC to legitemise any platform and without that power we are meeting as an interest group. If Letlapa is calling himself a president and is occupying the offices that are seen as that of PAC and we are not in support of that happening then we don't have much options except as an interest group of the party. The second group did not attend, because they have hopes in court ruling being in their favour to do away with Letlapa. We must remember court will rule in favour of those who presents their case clearly. Let us be hypothetical preparing our hearts for the worse that might happen. Let us say the court rule in favour of Letlapa, then what will be the next step? Those who went to Butterworth were trying every avenue to take away PAC from Letlapa and his group, therefore should not be seen as outsiders. Like those who are going to court are trying to take away PAC from Letlapa and his group, therefore should not seen outsiders. I should ask myself what am I doing to save PAC in order to take it back to the people except being intellectual in approach and speach and not initiating anything to do away with Letlapa and his group?
-- Sending your posting to [email protected] Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
