Yes, Dana, that's it in a nutshell.

Kevin
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question


> Yardbird,
>
> Pardon me for jumping in, but I think your problem is that you're
> misunderstanding what Kevin is telling you. correct me if I'm wrong,
Kevin,
> but my understanding is that the intermediate stage of writing an  image
> file to disk is NOT intended to correct/prevent errors that result from
> flaws on the source disk. Rather, it is intended to provide an opportunity
> to correct errors that were introduced in the transcription process, from
> source to destination, before these errors get permanently written to CD,
> thus producing an expensive coaster. Do I have it right, Kevin.
>
> Blessed Be,
>
> Dana
>
> D. S. Leslie, n�e C. R. Guttman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> �E OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE
> Your Source for Discounted Ideas
> http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Yardbird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 9:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
>
>
> > What I'm asking is, how does the intermediate stage of having this image
> > written to disk improve accuracy?  that is all I've been trying to ask
by
> > what I've said.  If the music CD from which you're ripping tracks has
> > flaws
> > that would distort the sound or introduce noises (I don't believe you
mean
> > the pops and clicks that plague LPs, really, do you?), then how does
this
> > intermediate step help protect against winding up with a noisy .mp3
file?
> > I
> > don't know what you mean by asking rhetorircally why the developer would
> > include this stage as an option.  I honestly don't know what's
> > accomplished
> > with this.  If it doesn't give the program a chance to clean up errors,
> > then
> > what good does it do?  I am *not* speaking sarcastically.  I'm really
> > asking.being
> >
> > Do you think I'm questioning the wisdom of the program writers who
include
> > this option?  No, not at all.  I'm not anywhere near being able to
address
> > something like that.  I honestly just don't see how making an
intermediate
> > copy is going to prevent you from getting bad sound from a damaged CD.
I
> > mean, what is done along the way to remedy a bad CD?  You're saying
> > nothing
> > is done?  Do you see what I'm not getting?  I don't know how else to
> > phrase
> > it.
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Kevin Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 12:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >
> >
> > No Joel.
> >
> > Once an image is created it's not going to be able to go back and clean
up
> > any imperfections.  My point is that the creation of the image itself
> > allows
> > the ripper to separate the processes.  If you're ripping on the fly you
> > won't get an image file at all because the encoding is being done on the
> > data stream as it leaves the CD-ROM.
> >
> > You really only need ask yourself a very simple question as to whether
you
> > want to use on the fly or not.  Do you think that developers put this
flag
> > in just to slow you down when ripping or burning?  The developer
obviously
> > wants their program to rip and burn at the maximum speed and quality so
> > why
> > would they build in a feature who's only purpose would be to slow you
> > down?
> >
> > It's pretty obvious I think that the trade off is that you forgo some
> > quality for speed and so it's really a personal choice.
> >
> >
> > Kevin
> > E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Yardbird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 6:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >
> >
> >> Kevin,
> >>
> >> You mean that when you have flaws on an audio CD, once they get written
> >> to
> >> an image file on disc, the encoding process is less likely to pick up
the
> >> flaws, somehow, as it creates the compressed file?
> >> appy----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Kevin Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 10:05 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Daniel.
> >>
> >> It's not that flaws at source can be fixed just because you've
unchecked
> > the
> >> "on the fly" checkbox.  If there are flaws on the CD then they will
cause
> >> issues whether you rip on the fly or not.
> >>
> >> The point I'm not making very well is that by breaking down a complex
> >> process involving the extraction and conversion of data from a spinning
> >> disc, there are less chances of issues arising if the process is
instead
> >> broken down into a number of discreet steps.  Specifically, separating
> >> the
> >> process of reading the disc to extract all audio information before any
> >> conversion to MP3 is done using an encoder that is applying complex
> >> algorithms to the data to assess what it thinks can be disregarded and
> > what
> >> it thinks needs to be retained to fulfil high quality sound
reproduction.
> >>
> >> Hope that's clearer.
> >>
> >> Kevin
> >> E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Yardbird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 5:26 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >>
> >>
> >> > kevin,
> >> > I don't quite understand.  If you aren't offered the opportunity to
> >> correct
> >> > an error yourself, then are you implying that somehow, during this
two
> >> step
> >> > process, errors from a damanged or flawed CD nonetheless do get
> > corrected
> >> > for before they're written to .mp3 from the image?  Only without your
> >> > intercession?  Is that it?  Otherwise,I don't understand how the
> > two-step
> >> > process ensures that flaws in the audio CD source don't get written
to
> >> .mp3.
> >> > Is my question clearer now?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > elps m isk e3tween
> >> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> > From: "Kevin Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 8:40 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > No, it won't detect potential errors and allow you to stop, continue
or
> >> fix
> >> > in situ.  By creating the image you are breaking down the tasks
> > associated
> >> > with ripping so that you extract in one step to your hard drive and
> >> > then
> >> > convert from there.  When on the fly you extract and convert in a
> >> > single
> >> > step.  It is for this reason alone that you are likely to have less
> >> > risk
> >> of
> >> > imperfections when ripping to an image first.
> >> >
> >> > Regards.
> >> >
> >> > Kevin
> >> > E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> > From: "Yardbird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > To: "PC-Audio" <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 4:31 PM
> >> > Subject: Kevin: On the fly, another question
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Kevin,
> >> > > Let's say I use the method of ripping that involves writing a file
or
> >> > image
> >> > > to disk and then ripping from that, the method you prefer for its
> >> > prudence.
> >> > > Okay.  So what if a CD I'm ripping tracks from turns out to have
the
> >> kinds
> >> > > of flaws that elicit this "jitter" error report and mean that
you'll
> >> wind
> >> > up
> >> > > with a messed-up .mp3 copy?  In what way does this method actually
> >> provide
> >> > > protection?  Does it stop the process at some point, notify you
that
> >> > there's
> >> > > a flaw, and offer the option to correct it by clicking on
something?
> > Or
> >> > if
> >> > > not that, what?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -- 
> >> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> > > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.1.0 - Release Date:
5/27/2005
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> > > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >> > >
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >> >
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -- 
> >> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.1.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -- 
> >> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.1.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >> >
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> http://www.pc-audio.org
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.2.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.2.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> http://www.pc-audio.org
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.2.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.2.0 - Release Date: 5/27/2005
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> http://www.pc-audio.org
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to