Would be interesteng to kno from folks who have actually use both to compare
the recording quality of the more professional recorders like the Edirol
ones with the plextalk pocket.

Andre

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: 08 October 2009 04:51 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again.

>From everything I've been told, it's an outstanding recorder, and a 
>modest
to fair book player.

Bruce

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Bob Seed wrote:

> Would like to see the specks on that unit before making a purchase. .
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sunshine" <[email protected]>
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Digital recorders again.
>
>
>> I totally agree with you Dean, the plextalk pocket is the most 
>> exclent  recording device on the market these days.
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "dean martineau" 
>> <[email protected]>
>>  To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <[email protected]>
>>  Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:36 PM
>>  Subject: RE: Digital recorders again.
>> 
>>
>>  What I know is that the PlexTalk Pocket is totally accessible, 
>> nicely  packaged, has both manual and automatic level control, and 
>> does a very  nice  job of recording from the line injack.  I doubt 
>> any other digital recorder  provides as much feedback, as this one is 
>> made for the blind.  Of course,  it  may (or may not, I don't know) 
>> cost more than others of similar quality,  but  there's no guesswork 
>> involved.  It's nice to be able to monitor through  the  speaker when 
>> making a line-in recording.
>>
>>  Dean
>> 
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>  On Behalf Of Tim Crawford
>>  Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:27 AM
>>  To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>  Subject: Digital recorders again.
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>>  Just wondering, which one of the flash memory based recorders 
>> recently  discussed here, would be most suitable for making high 
>> quality recordings  from an external source via line-in?  e.g. a
satellite receiver.
>>
>>  I don't intend recording via microphone, so that particular aspect 
>> of  performance is of limited interest.
>>
>>  Any views much appreciated.
>>
>>  Cheers,
>>
>>  Tim.
>>  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>  [email protected]
>>
>>  __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus  
>> signature  database 4487 (20091007) __________
>>
>>  The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>>  http://www.eset.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>  [email protected]
>> 
>>
>>  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>  [email protected]
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.5/2419 - Release Date: 
> 10/07/09 05:18:00
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [email protected]
>
>

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[email protected]
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2413 - Release Date: 10/07/09
05:18:00


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[email protected]

Reply via email to