Yeh, I tried to switch and start ripping to OGG, it being open source and all, but I had some trouble with the sound quality of some files where I was extracting the audio from a video. I guess I was running into some artifacts converting from one lossy format to another. I'm guessing some of those video formats are just containers for MP3 audio. I didn't investigate this much and ended up just going back to MP3 as my default.
On 21/02/12 09:27, Christopher Bartlett wrote: > For a lossy file format that sounds better (to my ears anyway) then MP3, try > ogg. > > Christopher Bartlett > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Brett Boyer > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:29 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: ripping my collection: advantages of eAC vs mainstream rippers > > Thanks for the advice. I guess insane is a strong word. I'd like to preserve > > the music but I don't think I will do flak. Still wondering if ripping to > mp3 320k is it worth using eAC? anyway. > thanks again > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [email protected] -- Christopher (CJ) [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected]
