I don’t recommend the a300 either. At about $1,200 it is more money and much more scanner than what a blind end user needs. The a320 or 3800 are real possibilities.
Kelly On 1/9/15, Samuel Wilkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I will be obtaining an OpticBook 4800 for flatbed scanning, as it is scans > very quickly. I would not recommend the A300, unless you plan to use it in > a learning resource centre or similar information centre. Also, it should > be noted that you will need to proofread what you are scanning, as even the > best scanners sometimes make nonsense of a book. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Olusegun > -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. > Sent: 09 January 2015 15:12 > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: Flatbed scanner > > Hello All: > > It would be great if there could be a handheld scanner; that way, I can > move > > it down the page and get the scan necessary and may be scan a book a bit > faster too. > > Presently, I'm trying to put a Canon all-in-one to the test; the ImageClass > > series will let me scan up to 50 pages at once! It will scan both sides of > > a page, but i do have to remove the cover of the book first. That's the > bad > > part but ok I guess! It's ireless, I don't have to be tethered to the > machine. I'll use Abbyy FineReader Pro. > > Sincerely, > Olusegun > Denver, colorado > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > > > >
