Young,
Yes, this is fine. idnits 2.11.07 turned up a couple of boilerplate
nits, one of which doesn't matter if the draft is submitted next week
and the other of which does not apply. idnits also found the following
reference change that the RFC Editor will take care of if the draft
isn't revised before then:
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-pce-pcep has been published as RFC
5440
Thanks,
--David
________________________________
From: Young Lee [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:36 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: PCE GCO 09 version
Hi David,
I hope this update will satisfy you. If you have any other
comments, please let me know. Thanks much for your thorough review.
Best Regards,
Young
________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:36 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: PCE GCO 09 version
Young,
The only thing from my review that I don't see in your proposed
-09 draft is providing the bit numbers for the new bits in the
RP object in Section 5.3 in addition to Section 9.1.
I noticed that the bit numbers in Sections 9.1 and 9.6 have
changed - was this based on checking with IANA and/or some
other coordinated means of managing the registries involved?
Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------
________________________________
From: young lee [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:28 PM
To: Adrian Farrel; Black, David
Cc: Young Lee; [email protected]
Subject: PCE GCO 09 version
Hi Adrian and David,
Here's the update on PCE GCO (09) reflecting all the
comments from you. However, I cannot upload to IETF-DRAFT-Submission
page until March 23. In the meantime, if you can review it, that will be
appreciated. Thanks.
Regards,
Young
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
