Hi David,
Thanks again. I will update the reference and submit the update next week. Best Regards, Young _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:26 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: PCE GCO 09 version Young, Yes, this is fine. idnits 2.11.07 turned up a couple of boilerplate nits, one of which doesn't matter if the draft is submitted next week and the other of which does not apply. idnits also found the following reference change that the RFC Editor will take care of if the draft isn't revised before then: == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-pce-pcep has been published as RFC 5440 Thanks, --David _____ From: Young Lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:36 PM To: Black, David Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: PCE GCO 09 version Hi David, I hope this update will satisfy you. If you have any other comments, please let me know. Thanks much for your thorough review. Best Regards, Young _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:36 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: PCE GCO 09 version Young, The only thing from my review that I don't see in your proposed -09 draft is providing the bit numbers for the new bits in the RP object in Section 5.3 in addition to Section 9.1. I noticed that the bit numbers in Sections 9.1 and 9.6 have changed - was this based on checking with IANA and/or some other coordinated means of managing the registries involved? Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 [email protected] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _____ From: young lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:28 PM To: Adrian Farrel; Black, David Cc: Young Lee; [email protected] Subject: PCE GCO 09 version Hi Adrian and David, Here's the update on PCE GCO (09) reflecting all the comments from you. However, I cannot upload to IETF-DRAFT-Submission page until March 23. In the meantime, if you can review it, that will be appreciated. Thanks. Regards, Young
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
