Dear all, We submitted a new version of the draft some months ago and received no feedback by now althought we integrated most of the comments received previously. We would like also the draft ot be considered for WG adoption so please give a look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03 and provide us feedback on the specific concerns that was addressed by: - section 4: Error-type and Notification-type are replaced by TLVs : a TLV to indicate the criticity level of errors, a TLV to indicate the type of notification (request-specific or not), a TLV to specify if the message must be propagate or not. The propagation of critical errors that consequently close the PCEP session is still feasible (we aim to cover all the behaviors) but optional by the introduction of a medium level of criticity. - section 5.3: specify the rules of TLV usages with the error and notification types defined in RFC 5440, 5441, 5455, 5521, 5557, 5886 and 6006. - section 6: Error and notification scenarios have been reformulated and focus on a sub-set of behaviors.
BR Helia Pouyllau
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
