Yes, support. Can authors explain the history mechanism presented today? The history of the messages should have been done/kept through using message IDs generally.
Huaimo -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt Dear all, We had a pretty strong support for adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors a PCE Working Group during our PCE WG meeting but as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list. Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors as a PCE WG Document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
