Support (as co-author ^^) Btw, default values are indicated (sorry that I did not have that in mind during the meeting) but it solely appear in the text and could be emphasized
Regards Helia -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Leeyoung Envoyé : jeudi 29 mars 2012 19:05 À : JP Vasseur; [email protected] Objet : Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt Support - With specifying the default value for new TLV's defined Young -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt Dear all, We had a pretty strong support for adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors a PCE Working Group during our PCE WG meeting but as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list. Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors as a PCE WG Document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
