Hi,

Over the years Dan and I have been asked a number of questions about PCE and how
it fits into different uses in the network.

Although we feel that the ABNO document (draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture)
goes a long way to explain the bigger picture, there are a lot of smaller,
everyday questions that need attention.

In an attempt to reduce the email we see, we have collected these into an
Informational I-D as below. Obviously, if you all send us comments and thoughts
on this document you will successfully thwart our plans :-)

Adrian and Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: 17 January 2013 15:30
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-farrkingel-pce-questions-00.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> 
> 
>       Title           : Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element
> Architecture
>       Author(s)       : Adrian Farrel
>                           Daniel King
>       Filename        : draft-farrkingel-pce-questions-00.txt
>       Pages           : 22
>       Date            : 2013-01-17
> 
> Abstract:
>    The Path Computation Element (PCE) architecture is set out in RFC
>    4655. The architecture is extended for multi-layer networking with
>    the introduction of the Virtual Network Topology Manager in RFC
>    5623, and generalized to Hierarchical PCE in RFC 6805.
> 
>    These three architectural views of PCE deliberately leave some key
>    questions unanswered especially with respect to the interactions
>    between architectural components.  This document draws out those
>    questions and discusses them in an architectural context with
>    reference to other architectural components, existing protocols, and
>    recent IETF work efforts.
> 
>    This document does not update the architecture documents and does not
>    define how protocols or components must be used.  It does, however,
>    suggest how the architectural components might be combined to provide
>    advanced PCE function.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrkingel-pce-questions
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrkingel-pce-questions-00
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to