El 15/01/2013 18:34, Julien Meuric escribió:
>
> This e-mail starts a WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06.
Please send your comments to the PCE. You may review the document in
front of the corresponding extension I-D, which should be last called soon.
Dear all,
Some random nits and comments after a fast read:
* Several paragraphs (incl. Section 4.1) refer to an expired:
[CSPF] T. Otani, et al, "Considering Generalized Multiprotocol
Label Switching Traffic Engineering Attributes During Path
Computation", draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-cspf-constraints-
07.txt, Feb., 2008.
* I am not sure of the implications of Section 3.2
- are must, should etc. MUST / SHOULD as per rfc2119?. In my humble
opinion it could help understanding since, as of now, the basic
assumptions could seem to imply that a PCE will not reply a e.g. strict
ERO with different regions/layers as long as they are ok within the
GMPLS hierarchy, although the paragraph below seems to allow otherwise.
* Decouple requirements from solutions? the draft cites PCEP-EXT (a
solutions document) to refer to requirements. PCEP-EXT refers to:
[PCEP-EXT] C.Margaria,et al, "PCEP extensions for GMPLS",draft-ietf-
pce-gmpls-PCEP-EXTs, in progress.
(incorrect reference btw)
* May need to be updated:
[PCE-WSON-REQ] Y.Lee, et al,"PCEP Requirements for WSON Routing and
Wavelength Assignment",draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-
wavelength, in progress.
* Would be nice to reflect Danielle et al. work on OTN post RFC4328
[OSPF-G709] D.Ceccarelli,et al,"Traffic Engineering Extensions to
OSPF for Generalized MPLS(GMPLS) Control of Evolving G.709
OTN Networks", in progress.
[RSVP-TE-G709] Fatai Zhang,et al,"Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching(GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving
G.709 Optical Transport Network Control", in progress.
thanks
R.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
